Rasterizer online dating

The Beijing IP Court previously granted an injunction against Sony back in March 2017, but the standard at issue there was WAPI, a seldom-used protocol which is only implemented in China. Imagine how many European SMEs would be subjected to worldwide or EU-wide embargoes due to just one single action of one patent bully or patent troll.

Based on a judgment delivered in a language that the SME does not even understand… █ Permalink Leave Your Comment Send this to a friend Summary: With infinitesimal chances of justice inside the EPO, workers turn to ILO, which has fallen really badly behind and is unable to correct injustices in a timely manner; there is, however, still hope THE EPO will no doubt play a big role in the next (and imminent) session of the ILO Administrative Tribunal.

The EPO‘s relationship with the EC/EP/EU comes across as complicity; it’s not looking good.

Mind the dates; the way we interpret this data, the European Parliament mission to the EPO was only published 2.5 years later (in December 2017).

He has lost any sense of shame and he now lies so blatantly that we can imagine the faces of EPO workers who read this ‘blog’ post of his (warning: link). Probably not because a few months ago he help defend the same lies about patent quality (in a private event that was publicly reported on). His lips utter words, which leave an odorous puddle of lies afoot.

It was promoted in the Organisation’s Twitter account some hours ago. We suppose that a rebuttal to these lies is in order because staff must have noticed these lies. Let’s look at the latest evidence of a decline in patent quality (as the EPO itself is unable to safely investigate the matter; staff representatives who merely brought up the subject were severely reprimanded by two Vice-Presidents). The EPO‘s Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) with Canada, which we mentioned on Tuesday morning, is now officially “news” (several days after it actually started).

It was the “big story” of the last session, where half the decisions concerned the EPO and several were about Judge Corcoran.

In any event, one cannot reasonably expect that a hasty training will allow building up the necessary level of expertise in all the small teams.” They don’t care about expertise; as we pointed out in several articles last night, Battistelli and his cabal just want patents issued as fast as possible and with miminal scrutiny/challenge. In other words, it is becoming the very LITTLE birdie whispered in our ears, noting that the documents above have been made public.

Also, based on this new article (just promoted by SUEPO), Ciaran Mc Ginley's departure predates or precedes some profoundly inane organisational chaos.

Mc Ginley himself used to be in staff representation albeit people we heard from generally regarded him to be somewhat of a “sellout” (to top-level management).

Where were these ‘public’ servants when that happened?

Battistelli, as noted in this article from today, further shields his nepotist succession plan so that his mates will continue to control the EPO long after he’s gone.

Leave a Reply